Followers

Wednesday, 1 April 2020

The theme for our writing group this month "Just a thought..."

Hello ladies,    This month we are restricted to our homes but we'll meet on zoom.us later on.  
I have concocted a meal called the "Buddha bowl" with spinach salad, quinoa, roasted chickpeas, grilled chicken, avocado, tomatoes, cucumbers, sesame seeds.  

Up to you to provide a nice Chablis well chilled please.  

 _________________________________________________________

Monica's story


Just a thought March 2020

When I say to my husband I have been thinking or  just a thought, his reply is with good humour  that sounds both dangerous or expensive or both so which is it?

When we have theses thoughts either serious or frivolous, we have no idea how hard our brains work to process these thoughts, in seconds the brain is processing our thoughts and  selecting, a logical choice heart from head kind of situation, a person must weigh the positives  and the negative options the brain is processing the positive and negative options each thought your mind and brain are working so hard to consider each thought carefully .

Thought process's can cause disorder and disturbance, remembering, reasoning  the thought process problem solve and try and judge the fear intuition and perception.

Thought processing is like a series of sparks constantly firing other parts of our brain our brains light up to make these process flow hence brain storming because it is like a storm in our brains

The game of chess is so good for our brains slow time considering not only our moves but our opponents moves.

Thoughts cannot be directly observed but can only be described by the person concern, not always easy for a Physicist or a councillor  trying to help people through traumatic thought process's they are desperately trying to process his or her patient  thoughts.

So next time I say to my husband just had a thought, I will tell him how hard my tiny brain has had to work.



_________________________________

From Sarah


Just a thought 3  Lead Role
(05.03.2020, rev. 01.04.2020)


Just a thought.  Not a nice one. But then she needn't follow up on it.  Of course she wouldn't.  She was not that sort of person.  
It was just a passing idea with no intention behind it.
Still, that Sybil really deserved a showing up.  Somebody should do it. 
But nobody would. Except herself, if she could really bring herself to it.  
How could the others bear the girl's constant preening and self-satisfaction? All right, she was, probably, the best dancer in the class.  
Probably. The teacher seemed to think she was the best, but she wasn't that good. She wasn't perfect.
“My arabesques are higher than hers, I'm sure of it!”  she thought to herself. “My pas de chats are crisper.  And my battements … !  
And I've worked so hard.  I really ought to have got the role.  But Sybil fawns, and smiles at the judges, and bows so gracefully at the end.  
Why she even fell down! And Madame even complimented her: 'Nobody falls so gracefully as you do.'  Falls so gracefully!”
There was an hour before the next lesson, or, more precisely, the dress rehearsal.  An hour to kill. 
She wandered around the dressing room, restless. Where were the others?  
With nothing better to do she went out to the cleaner's cupboard, which was left unlocked, as usual. 
 The wax was in its place. It stood there, almost staring at her. She clacked the cupboard door shut.  Such a mad idea. 
She went back to the dressing room and poked about. Really, so strange that she should be the only one there.  
As if it were planned for her.
Sybil's shoes were in her pigeon-hole.  Nobody had a locker in this school, which was run just as it had been when Madame was a pupil here.
  How very very easy it would be. Should she let this occasion pass? 
 Sybil would surely not notice anything different, she would be too concerned about getting her costume just right.
During the rehearsal, the most extraordinary thing happened. 
 On Sybil's first pirouette, her foot slid inexplicably out from under her and she lost her balance completely.  
She did not fall gracefully, but banged down on the floor with a crack, and then lay still. When she did not get up, everything stopped.  
“She's hit her head!” said her partner.
“Is it serious?” asked Madame, distraught.  
It seemed as though it were.  They had to call an ambulance and Sybil was taken away.  
Although this would cause serious problems for tomorrow's performance, their teacher seemed mostly concerned about Sybil, and 
seemed ready to drop everything and leave for the hospital.
“Excuse me, Madame, but who's going to play Giselle then?”
“Giselle?  Oh, tomorrow.  I don't know! You can do it can't you?”  And she was off.
She had the role!  Triumph! The rehearsal was over, but she practised for the rest of the afternoon.  
She would be better than Sybil could ever have been!
The next morning however, when she met the others, their faces were all cast down.  Some of them were crying.
“What's the matter?”
Someone pointed to a photocopied message posted on the wall.  The first words she read stopped her in her tracks.
“The performance cancelled!  How can they!”
Another weeping dancer shook her head and pointed back to the little sign.  Whatever was the matter with them? 
She was disappointed too; in fact, she was enraged.  But she wasn't going to cry over it. She was angry and she intended to protest.
“They can't do this!  I've worked, I mean we've worked so hard!  It's not as if we haven't got a lead!”
But the girls continued to point to the message.  So she went back and peered at it more closely. 
 And when she had finished the first few lines, she began to feel cold all over.
“Due to the untimely death of our dear pupil Sybil Dubois, the school will follow a period of mourning.  
All performances ...”
It couldn't be!  Only a slip, a fall!
“During the night,” someone said.  “She never woke up.”
She had never meant this.  It was just a thought, or had been, at least to start with.  Just a bad idea.
+ 710 wds 

___________________________________________


Paula's contribution: Just a thought:



If Cinderella’s shoe fit perfectly, why did it fall off?


On a poison’s expiration date, does that mean it is more poisonous, or no longer poisonous?


If you get scared half to death twice, do you die?


Why are blueberries purple?


In the word “scent,” which letter is silent, the “s” or the “c”?


Why is something sent by car called a shipment, but something sent by ship is called cargo?


If it’s called quicksand, why do you sink slowly?


Why is a ‘W’ called a double-U? Shouldn’t it really be called a double-V?


The word “swims” upside down is also “swims.”


One hundred years ago, most people owned horses, and only the rich owned cars. Now, most people own cars, and only the rich own horses.


Replacing the “w” with a “t” in what, where and when gives you the answer.
What: that
Where: there
When: then


If you rip a hole in a net, there are actually fewer holes in it than before.


Why did kamikaze pilots wear helmets?


Why do we say, “slept like a baby,” when babies wake up every few hours?


Why is the word for “fear of long words” one of the longest words in the dictionary?
 (It’s hippopotomonstrosesquippedaliophobia.)


If something goes without saying, why do people still say it?


We pass the anniversary of our death every year without knowing it.


Why doesn’t glue stick to the inside of the bottle?


If a spoon is made of gold, would it still be called silverware?


Why does the word “ambiguous” have only one meaning?


How do vampires always look so perfectly groomed when they can’t see themselves in a mirror?


The word “wrong” is spelled w-r-o-n-g in the dictionary.


The only time the word “incorrectly” isn’t spelled incorrectly, is when it’s spelled incorrectly.


Why is “bra” singular, but “panties” is plural?


Why are there so few synonyms for “thesaurus?”


Why can I remember song lyrics from the ’80s, but I can’t remember why I walked upstairs?


Why is it penny for your thoughts, but you have to put your two cents in?


Why isn’t a near-miss called a near-hit?


Remember, if Plan A fails, you have 25 letters left.

___________________________________________________



From Geraldine

It sounds better when read « alta voce »


JUST A THOUGHT

Just a thought
So, what if the Antarctic was to melt….

Just a thought
What if the oceans were to flood more and more…

Just a thought
And how come the winds would blow stronger and stronger…

Just a thought
And when will the floods reach the big towns on the sea-shore ?

Just a thought
When will the men and women on this earth come back to nature ?

Just a thought
What if they got help from a tiny  wyne virus

Just a thought
And what if this little virus decided to go on a round-trip around the world…

Just a though
Would it frighten all these people living on this beautiful planet ?

Just a thought
Would they think twice about wasting, polluting and destroying their lovely and lonely Planet ?

Just a thought
And if this incredible little virus opened people’s eyes to the future, the Planet’s future, their own future, considering we are all part of it all !

Just a thought
Or a dream !!!

_______________________________________________

Jackie's post:



Wait a minute ladies,
You want me to talk about “a thought”  talk about ” just a thought” well

Now hang on there, this is a far fetched impossiblity
Can’t you see I’m busy
We’re in the middle of a crisis here
A total lockdown on our movements – confined in our homes, apartments and rooms without balconies  with only our heads, hearts and souls  to preoccupy our virus prone selves.
Do you really think I have time for a thought?
Just a thought?  most certainly not,  I’ve never been busier.  
My day is full,  all stops pulled out,  from the time I get up at 7 am till I slip exhausted into the arms of Morpheus at 11pm

My name is not  “The Thinker” the statue by Auguste Rodin  – who has all the time in the world to sit on his stone pillar with arm on knee  thinking, pondering, reflecting , meditating and contemplating the tourists wandering  around the charming garden of a Paris museum.

I’m  busy doing what people do in a lockdown stuck in a rural  country village .   Making bread, pizzas and cakes, checking the wine stock, preparing  aperitifs, drinking bubbly, cooking dinner, visiting the virtual world on my computer, travelling in essence to far off countries I’ll never  physically visit, listening to Operas, concerts and visiting museums.  And watching Netflix!

Chatting with neighbours through the window of my workshop downstairs,  (keeping of course the reglementary spit free 2 meter distance)  Reading the newspapers, sending videos, talking on the phone…… all this takes  time –
Then there is the garden. 
 A patch of land has never been so weed free –
I now apply tweezers to grab that sun seeking little blade that dares poke his head above the soil I have so carefully primed.

I gave up having “just a thought” years ago as when I did have one, if not written down,  it disappeared as quickly as it had appeared lost forever  along with the millions of others spiraling into oblivion churning  like my washing machine round and round my aging brain.
   
Thoughts don’t stay – a second or more or an eighth or whatever is the smallest piece of time there is.     And there it is – that thought – gone then … for ever.    Or perhaps not forever as they creep back into my head slowly or like a flash when you are not expecting them and then you suddenly remember that image, or list, appointment  or that something that had to be fetched, cooked or washed.     

Just a thought then, is a timeless piece of uselessness -

______________________________________________________
Annemarie's post

What Do You Think?
Next weekend would be their eleventh wedding anniversary and Peter had hinted at a surprise
weekend. It was already arranged that the three children were spending the first week of the
holidays with her parents, happily exploring the hills and woods around the old farm nestled in the
Devon countryside but he failed to realise that she enjoyed time spent with the children during
their holidays. Her husband brushed aside her reservations, telling her she really needed to get
the kids ready and packed.
After a brisk shower she prepared muesli - Peter said it was important the children had
homemade muesli - not all those rubbish cereals encrusted with sugar - freshly squeezed orange
juice (after all 'we don't hyper children, do we ,darling?'. She watched them lovingly as they
spooned their way through breakfast, little Joshua's corn-coloured curls bobbing up and down as
his chubby three-year old hands struggled to balance the rather large spoon. Of course she
would miss them but she had a lot to do before taking them to her parents.
First it was a visit to the hairdresser - 'Joshua can't go around looking like a girl, it's about time he
had a proper haircut,' Peter had said yesterday. 'And why don't you get the girls some smart
shoes? They seem to wear those awful trainers all the time wherever they go. You could treat
yourself to a new coat as well - something blue and classy like Jeffrey Highberg's wife and treat
yourself to something special for the dinner. You could wear it to the restaurant on Wednesday
when I meet up with the Highbergs and the top man from head office. I really need to impress
them if I am to get this directorship.
Valerie thought about the expensive dresses in her wardrobe bought to impress at various
dinners, the extravagant necklaces Peter gave her at Christmas - precious shimmering pearls set
in platinum, the exquisitely Italian designed gold choker with matching earrings, always chosen by
Peter. With a sigh she cleaned the kitchen, bundled the three children in the car, decided against
curl-cutting at the hairdresser's and shoe-shopping for the girls and set off to her parents, where
she spent a leisurely hour chatting with her mother and admiring the tree house her father was
building for the grandchildren. A call from Peter to see how the shopping was going with a gentle
reminder to find something sophisticated to show off his lovely wife.
She really didn’t feel like trailing round the shops, trying on dresses and coats and later in the
week she would have to have her facial, have her nails done and go to the hairdresser - Peter
liked her to take pride in her appearance. Oh, how she would like to put some old clothes and
spend time in the garden, how she would like to spend time with old friends - friends she rarely
saw, friends “who weren't quite the right sort” as far as Peter was concerned.
Now that Peter was expecting to get the directorship he was planning on sending the children to
private schools as boarders - “to get a fine education and meet the right people”. Valerie could
not bear to think of her children away from home. This time she was determined to stand up to
Peter; he always succeeded in getting his own way and she felt increasingly submerged in her
husband's excessive ambition. Well she would spend the day in London do her shopping and she
might even meet an old friend or saunter round a gallery.
The morning of the dinner Peter phoned her to say he had an important meeting so he would
meet her at the London restaurant. Well she had all day to get ready ; a facial, manicure and then
the hairdresser - a different style tonight she thought.
When she arrived home she put on her favourite Nina Simone record, poured a deep bath of
foaming bubbles and with a glass of white wine relaxed in the suds. An hour later the doorbell
rang and Valerie put on her new blue coat , picked up her bag and left for the restaurant in the
taxi.
Outside the restaurant she could see Peter sitting at the table with, presumably, the top man from
head office. She waited until the Highbergs arrived and followed behind them as the waiter led
them to their table. table. Peter rose from his seat, greeted the Highbergs and turning to his wife
and with a shocked look on his face he stuttered, “V-Valerie, let me take your coat.” She carefully
removed the new coat and Peter gaped in astonishment - a semi-transparent, coral, lace dress,
low-cut and slashed almost to the waist, revealing a generous décolletage and bear arms
encircled with jangling bracelets. A gold leather belt cinched her waist. The dress was tight and
stopped a good 5 inches above her knees. His eyes continued to travel down her legs to the gold
six-inch heel shoes, leather straps encircling her ankles, finishing in an extravagant bow. His eyes
were drawn back up the length of her, took in the scarlet lipstick, the heavily made-up eyes with
extraordinary false eyelashes, her now unfamiliar face surrounded in a cloud of blond curls. Mouth
wide open he continued to gape at her. Victoria smiled at the Highbergs and the top man from
head office, turned to Peter and still smiling she said quietly, “Darling, what do you think?”






 

Sunday, 22 March 2020

Comments about the book: A Summer Bird-Cage by Margaret Drabble






Hello everyone,    Here are the comments on the book we have read this month.    In principle you can make observations or remarks at the bottom of this blog post.  Some of you who don't know of our writing blog may like to scroll down and check out our stories that we've been compiling for some time now.   The blog was first started in 2011 for me personally so please excuse any personal stuff in previous posts.
Please enjoy a piece of this virtual mocha and hazelnut cake and a cup of tea.  Scroll down on the right to see the recipe.     Bon appetit and happy reading !!

 


______________________________________________________
Comments sent in by Geraldine Chabrier


In the middle of the book, I investigated to find out when it had been written, for I had undergone   , myself, some of the expectations for a women’s behavior in the « bourgeois » environment  in the past.  So, in 1963, I was 18 and we were to have women’s lib with oral contraception and the earthquake that went with it.

So, it gave me to think of the difference between these two sisters, with them comparing their ways of living, their relationship to men, their vision of their women friends and their seek for freedom : Louise trying to solve the problem by marrying a rich man and finding out that it was somehow impossible.  Sarah trying to live a free life, but with a constant eye on her sister’s  choices and behavior…

And finding out that within the 10 following years, things had change so much for us women.

I remember my father hoping I would marry a doctor or a lawyer, which would keep me safe with money and…. Keep me at the « bourgeois » level he was from !  But the change occurred at this time which was lucky.

 And so, I continued reading the book with this in sight : because at the beginning, I couldn’t help but feel  irritated at the futile lives and thoughts of these people : I’m I dressed OK for the occasion, how do people look at me ?  how am I supposed to relate to them ? Am I taking the right drink ?  What do I achieve by traveling to Rome or Paris ?  Everybody just seemed to be looking at themselves and only themselves and the relation to the others  or the outside world seemed missing or superficial.

And so, the last Chapter, « The Collision » is one of the most interesting confrontation between 2 worlds that I have ever read.  It talks about real relations, how the two sisters drop the mask, solidarity,  decision (Louise’s to drop Stephen), outlook on maternity, what it means to be a woman.

I like the construction of the book, the way it brings one slowly to the conclusion and it rings a bell as woman are, to-day- hoping for more freedom , self-construction and equality (i.e. the outcome of Weinstein and other men’s regard towards women that is going to have to change again and this has already started.)

So, I liked the modernity of the book, the way it was constructed, the writing itself and the way it made me think… and also the lightness of some scenes that also made me laugh, which is a good thing !
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Annemarie's comments
Loved the actual writing and wonderful descriptions of clothes which took you right back to the times. It is not surprising Drabble and her sister, A.S. Byatt fell out with each other. There seems to be a lot of autobiographical  detail and the sister is not depicted as very likeable. Although there is very little plot the characters are well-described and the story remains intriguing.  I don't think I actually enjoyed it and there was a little part of me comparing it to modern day Facebook, selfies etc with so much egoistical detail - words do work better for me than endless selfies!
 --------------------------------------------------------
Comments by Dawn

Hello everyone and hope you are all well.  I think I’ve read ‘Jerusalem The Golden’ also by Margaret Drabble and think I have a copy but can’t find it.  It’s not a book that I remember well except that it was associated with feminism. 

I think Drabble was an important writer of her time but I’m not sure her books will be read by many in years to come.  She’ll maybe be remembered as a window into the world of women in the swinging 60s and later.  A Summer Bird-Cage is her first novel so can be forgiven for not being perfect.  

I felt I really didn’t care much one way or another about either of the sisters and their lives - it seems to be a bit autobiographical as Drabble and her sister are said to have not gone on very well.  Drabble was a wealthy middle-class woman with everything on her side - parents, connections, education.  I was never interested in clothes, makeup, gossip or nights out - I was brought up on a farm where there wasn’t time for such things. 

I think of the same period I like the novels of Margaret Foster who was a year older than Drabble are much better.  Her father was a fitter in a factory and her mother a housewife.  She was brought up on a council estate.

Foster had nothing handed to her on a plate and wrote books like ‘Georgy Girl’ about a life which seems much more solid and important.  Foster had a gift, an ability to take ordinary lives and transform them into fiction of the highest order. I think, of the period, she was a far better writer. 

--------------------------------------------------
Jackie's thoughts



I found this book to be so frivolous, superficial and shallow that I didn’t read all of it.   For the first few chapters  I was so bored by the descriptions of socialites their lives and conversations, what they choose to wear and all the little chit chatty that I skipped quite a lot until I got to page 210 where Louise admits she married Stephan Halifax for money (which I could of told you in the first chapter)   She wanted to be safe financially which I can understand but I have no respect for someone (even a character in a book) who can marry someone just for the prestige and money.   It didn't seem to go anywhere.  No plot.
… no I didn’t enjoy it at all found it old fashioned and extremely tedious and certainly won’t encourage me to read any of her other books although saying that if someone recommends one that is a little more umpy then I'm game.     

I suggest we read:   The Plague by Albert Camus as our next book … but just my suggestion.   

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lucy's comments


Ms. Drabble has great prose, I really got excited with the beginning of my read, wow I thought, she has a lovely “way with words”! But after a while I got bogged down with the plot (or lack thereof), and with the characters either gossiping or preening.
            The jealousy issue seems to be the most evident theme and colors the path taken by the narrator. Not having had siblings, I found this all a bit trivial and not worth the fuss? But then again I was an “only child” and didn’t experience this kind of tension so this left me in the cold.
            Both characters were I presume purposefully made to be over self-involved, paralyzed in their present situations, their next move on Life, or mulling constantly over missteps taken in their pasts, not really interesting to me. My worst enjoyment was reading chapter  9 when Wilfred (what a snarky man) gives Sarah the lowdown on and on about Louise’s affair was so irritating, I was rolling my eyes, not worth the long chapter in such a short book. I found all this quite shallow…
            The best that I liked were the first couple of chapters where I loved her writing style and the ending about the shower cap and Louise’s inability to think past her ludicrous appearance, so revealing! The last sentence in the book is so clever, a most original ending of any book I have read!
            Altogether I liked her style of writing a lot and would read what you all consider her best work, please suggest one for me.
           
This one was pretty good for a first novel by a young woman in times when educated women had difficulties with their identities and futures (Hmmm maybe many still don’t…).
I would give it 🍷🍷
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes from Paula


I liked the book. In fact, I liked it enough to be reading it a second time right now, underlining sentences and phrases that delight me. For example: “Girls shouldn’t share flats, but who else can they share them with? … The whole of the next month went on in the same way, cluttered up with intractable material objects like dirty saucepans and shoes that needed new heels…” and “The days pass, which is the most I could expect of them…” and “’She even comes into my bedroom,’ said Louise, in tones of such disdain that she might have been talking about an earwig, not a first cousin.”

I find her use of language, the way she strings words together, quite charming and smart. This kind of writing can make me laugh out loud, which I did often while reading “A Summer Bird-Cage.”

The book’s plot is wickedly clever, and being a “little sister,” I can relate to many of her characterizations. I find in Louise a bit of both of my older sisters, without the imperiousness, and of course, she was no doubt created as an amalgram of Margaret Drabble’s own older sister. A friend was over one evening – before the lockdown – and she said, “Oh, Margaret Drabble. Isn’t her sister the famous novelist X?” She couldn’t think of the name, so as soon as she was gone, I googled Drabble, and sure enough, her sister is the novelist A.S. Byatt. And their real-life sisterly feud is apparently quite infamous, their unrelenting competition as writers, and their shared distaste for their domineering mother. Apparently, they haven’t spoken in years, one reason being the way Drabble writes about “older sisters.” I found this highly amusing and sad, at the same time.

I also liked the organization of the book, the simple way chapters were organized and titled, to move the reader through the book in a completely linear fashion. Often when such a short book begins in the middle of the characters’ stories, it can be hard to follow, but her beginning, when Sarah is heading home from Paris for Louise’s wedding, introduces the main characters succinctly yet with depth.
The final chapter, “The Collision,” is, of course, the inevitable collision that Louise’s duplicitous life was heading toward, but it’s also a collision of the two sisters, their coming together, finally, in a collision of support and their own kind of love. A very satisfying conclusion, indeed. (Although I so did want to meet Francis!) And the last line of the book just might be one of my favorite last lines in fiction.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments from Mary
Enjoyable?

Yes.

It was not cruel, but see below.

What about the literary style

Clever and sometimes complex.

Longish paragraphs and some sentences needed rereading to follow them (or perhaps I should not be reading late at night!). It was a mixture of chattiness, stream of consciousness narrative and brief interludes of dialogue. Drabble was trying out different modes?

Several key words

Sardonic, witty, introspective

The 60’s

Yes, it caught the feel of the early 60’s when for women, education, career, marriage were breaking away from the post-war.

Social setting

Jilly Cooper meets academe but with a heavy dose of irony.

Characterisation

Thin in places but it is a slim novel.

Was it a pastiche or do people really have the luxury of time for all that probing of self and others in their early 20’s? The reference to the friend in Streatham beset by mortgage and babies and the reaction of and high opinions of themselves held by Louise and Sarah suggest that this was Drabble being very disparaging about said luxury.

The trajectory of the story

Sarah drew the reader in as a confidante to the tale that she was narrating - it was a knowing book. It held my attention, pulling me on to its satisfying, rather graceful, ending.

The story

All about Louise. Or Sarah? Hmm.

The relationship clearly drew on Drabble’s relationship with her sister. Personally, it was so recognisable for me (the relationship with one of my sisters and including the bridesmaid dress required to be worn when I was 16, plumb in the middle of the 60’s).

The mother/daughter relationship described in the book was odd, but probably typical of many. Very different from those in the Joy Luck Club!

Sarah’s thoughts about career etc. must have been influenced by the lost career of Drabble’s mother, who was herself a scholar but was trapped by motherhood, Sheffield and her job as a teacher.

Anything else

Perhaps we should have read A S Byatt’s first novel alongside… but I guess that many a thesis has been written on that already.

Mary

--------------------------------------------------------

 Comments from Alison

When I suggested this book, I remembered reading it years ago and being delighted to find it again.  I think that I must have read it soon after it was first published and it does carry themes that would have seemed of critical importance then. 

Re-reading it now, I felt that it was somewhat dated.  The feminist question of what intelligent and educated women should do with their lives is something about which we have all made the best choices we found possible.  I can see from my own daughters lives that much has changed since those heady days of the sixties.

What really had interested me, even at the time, was Louise's attitude to money.  I remember her saying something to the effect that it was pointless to marry for money as you would always want more than you had.  For example, she said, if you could buy a gown by a famous designer, you would then want one specifically created for you.  In other words, someone else would always have more and you would never be satisfied.  I have read the book through twice and cannot find this passage in it, so perhaps I am wrong.  But I notice that I have a US publication here and wonder if the UK editions could be different.  Please do let me know if you have seen this passage or something like it.

Anyway, I hope that some of you enjoyed the book.  My own life, a few years later, of university and London was not a million miles from the novel.  It made me homesick now for a world when we could mix and talk freely; it will be good to have cakes and tea again!


----------------------------------------------------------
Monica's thoughts

I didn't actually really enjoy this book .    In fact, if I am really honest,  I found it a little boring.    I feel guilty saying this as I think it is a piece of English literature to be revered but sorry I didn't.    Perhaps because I am an only child felt the whole story was around two sisters who didn't seem to be able to cope with real life.
----------------------------------------------------------------

Our stories

My favorite memory

  Geraldine's story I was going to be nine : two years older than the « reason age » when you are supposed to unders...